On Jul 27, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 06:53 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> >>> Hi Kumar, >>> >>> For meta-intel, it's pretty simple and is summarized by this blurb from >>> the meta-intel MAINTAINERS file: >>> >>> "Please submit any patches against meta-intel BSPs to the Yocto mailing >>> list ([email protected])." >>> >>> Basically, new patches get submitted to the mailing list, go through the >>> standard on-list comment and review process, and then get pulled into >>> master by whoever maintains the BSP when everything looks good. >>> >>> Hope that helps, >>> >>> Tom >> >> Ok, same model would work for meta-fsl-ppc. The one question I have is if >> it make sense to migrate such patches over to '[email protected]' >> list. >> > > Hmm, I completely forgot about that list, and apparently everybody else > has too (no messages in it). It's also not linked to from anywhere on > the Yocto site that I can see e.g. Community | Mailing Lists. > > Personally I'd prefer less fragmentation of lists, and think it would > get better review and exposure on the yocto list, but if it makes more > sense to people to start using the yocto-bsp list, fine with me... > > Tom > >> - k >
I'm good w/just using the main yocto list for now until traffic gets to a point we think it makes sense to split it off - k _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
