On 10/11/2011 04:49 PM, Tim Bird wrote: > On 10/10/2011 11:41 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >> As part of working on meta-tiny, I've come across a need (want?) to >> present users with the ability to select some set of features in a local >> configuration file that will impact the build of the image and a set of >> recipes. > > Can you tell me more about meta-tiny? this is the first I've heard > about this (sorry if discussion went by on the mailing list and I > missed it), and I'm very interested. > > I'm currently doing some size-related work for Sony (including > some work to support 4K stacks). >
Perhaps while I have the attention of a few interested parties, it would be a good time for a poll. I'm interested in your motivation for smaller images. Are you building SoC's with memory on die and needing to keep the memory footprint down to save precious die real-estate? Are you looking at creating mass-market products and saving a few pennies on the flash storage translates to real money, so you want to minimize the physical size? Are you concerned with boot time, and have connected larger image sizes with longer boot times? Is there another motivating factor for your interest in small images? Thanks, -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
