On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi all,
We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros (latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd like to update and re- post the patch [3] so we can close bug #1096 [4] but for that we need to agree on the list. Thanks, Paul [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-August/004699.html [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded.poky/6959 [3] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky- contrib/log/?h=paule/sanity-distros [4] http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096 -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto You may not be looking for anecdotal build data but I imagine I'm one of the few building on FC 16. Through an unintentional upgrade (don't ask), I have built and tested the following combinations to boot on actual hardware built on a Fedora Core 16 host: On a Routerstation Pro: Core image minimal Core image basic Core image base (both USB Root file system and SD root file system) demo-image-mediatomb (but mediatomb itself segfaults in initialization) On a Beagleboard Core Image Sato (with Linksys USB network adapter functioning) demo-image-mediatomb (mediatomb does not segfault). I'm having some trouble on the Atom platform but I think it is operator error, not host platform. David David Smoot [email protected] _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
