On 12/13/2011 03:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 11-12-13 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of >> linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as >> connman) that expect more recent headers (if_alg.h is missing prior to >> 2.6.39). While the proper fix is to ensure these packages can cope with >> older headers, for MACHINES shipping 3.0+ kernels, seems to me we should >> be using the linux-libc-headers matching the kernels. I know this has >> come up in the past, but I don't recall if we have clearly stated and >> justified what our policy is here. > > They should match were possible. I updated master to have 3.0 and 3.1 > headers and no longer have .37 as the default. > > Where is the 2.6.37 trickling in ? i.e. which boards/branch ?
This was on fri2 yocto/standard/fri2. > > Bruce > >> >> Any thoughts on this? >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
