On 01/02/12 15:03, Joshua Lock wrote:
On 01/02/12 14:52, Joshua Lock wrote:
+++ b/meta-sys940x/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_4.47.bbappend
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:"
+RDEPENDS_${PN} += "genmac"
We can use a MACHINE specific override here, I think.
RDEPENDS_${PN}_sys940x += "genmac"
Ideally we don't want that interfaces file on non-sys940x machines,
perhaps we could name the interfaces file differently and add a
do_install_append_sys940x which installs the MACHINE specific interface
file?
In this instance, however, I don't know what would happen if we built
netbase with this layer enabled for a different core2 MACHINE and then
built for the sys940x....
I suspect the existing core2 package would be used and think for this
approach to work we'd need to mark this recipe MACHINE specific.
I was missing a detail here which Koen pointed out, if you use a MACHINE
OVERRIDE in SRC_URI BitBake should mark the package as MACHINE specific.
I've submitted a patch to make netbase MACHINE specific by default but
should that patch not be accepted the use of an OVERRIDE on SRC_URI or
explicitly setting PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}" in the bbappend will
be an appropriate fix.
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
