Is BSP licensing different than non-BSP licensing? If not, then licensing could be combined into a single section. Can someone answer this for me?
Also, good point on the BSP guide appearing as a chapter in the reference manual. I have not liked this. Is there any rational reason to have it this way? Scott -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 5:53 AM To: Yocto discussion list Subject: [yocto] can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix? still clawing my way through the ref manual and it seems that there's *way* too much coverage of licensing sprinkled throughout. most people are not going to care about licensing until the time comes to maybe start distributing their BSP. as it stands, in the *development* version of the ref manual, section 3.4 is all about licensing, then ch 4 is essentially the BSP guide where section 4.2.1 is "License Files" and all of section 4.3 is "BSP Licensing Considerations." that just seems like too much licensing info that breaks up the flow of the reference manual. can all of that be moved to one location and referenced from there? rday p.s. i'm also not keen on an entire chapter of the ref manual being nothing more than an include of the BSP guide. if you've got a perfectly respectable BSP guide, there's no point having it magically appear as part of another manual. but that's just my $0.02. -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
