On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Lu, Lianhao <lianhao...@intel.com> wrote:
> Saul Wold wrote on 2012-04-11:
>> On 04/10/2012 08:16 AM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
>>> Hi Saul,
>>>
>>> I think I might have some clues why the python-nativesdk failed at 
>>> http://autobuilder.pokylinux.org:8010/builders/nightly-x86/builds/433.
>> It's due to the commit
>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=stage/ma
>> ster_under_test&id=a1f1cc4c27b5091870b1dbd9ede7c24c38d 765dd.
>>>
>>> I guess the above commit which changed eglibc-nativesdk to version 2.15
>>> has some conflict to the sstate-cache the autobuilder used, which might
>>> contains content from old eglibc-nativesdk 2.13.
>>>
>> Yes, that would do it, I will hit the sstate reset button and do a build
>> that should clear this, but will cause problems for most people, I
>> wonder if we need a PR bump in eglibc also?
>>
>
> I think theoretically the PV change from 2.13 to 2.15 has the same effect of 
> PR bump. I guess maybe some -nativesdk packages(other than eglibc-nativesdk) 
> which was built upon eglibc-nativesdk 2.13 didn't get rebuilt somehow and 
> went from sstate-cache directly into sysroot.
>
> Since I can't reproduce this compile failure on my local build, do we have 
> the failure environment on autobuilder which I can log on and check?

Should the new OEBasicHash force a rebuild of those packages though?

-M
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to