On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 09:58 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote: > On 07/21/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:55 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > >> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 15:39 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:35 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote: > >>>> On 07/20/2012 04:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote: > >>>>> On 07/20/2012 01:11 PM, Jim Abernathy wrote: > >>>>>> There must be some basic thing I'm missing. Nothing that I used to > >>>>>> build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or tracking > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> denzil branch. Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.0.1 before > >>>>>> you can run? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd thought I'd check before I post a bunch of log files. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I just downloaded the poky 7.0.1 tarball and cd'ed to that untarred > >>>>>> directory and untarred the 7.0 Intel BSPs. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There must be a step I'm missing. otherwise this would not have gotten > >>>>>> thru testing before deployment. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jim A > >>>>> Hi Jim, > >>>>> > >>>>> We need more specific information about the error(s) you're seeing. > >>>>> We've done extensive QA with 7.0.1 and meta-intel, so I imagine there > >>>>> must be a step you've forgotten. > >>>>> > >>>>> For example, you are using the denzil branch of meta-intel, right? > >>>>> > >>>>> Scott > >>>>> > >>>> I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank in > >>>> the linux-yocto bbappend file. Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed > >>>> before 7.0.1 was deployed. I'll put in the ones I used to patch in and > >>>> see if it works. > >>>> > >>> I updated the n450 in both the denzil and master meta-intel branches, > >>> but the tarball still needs to be updated with that fix. > >>> > >>> Is this the problem you're seeing, or are there other problems you're > >>> seeing with this and/or the other meta-intel BSPs? > >>> > >> As a sanity check, I just now downloaded the denzil-7.0.1 tarball and > >> the denzil sugarbay tarball and built successfully without any problems. > >> > > Also did a fresh clone of meta-intel, checked out meta-intel/denzil and > > successfully built n450 with the denzil-7.0.1 tarball here with no > > problems. > > > > Tom > > > I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for > denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default core-image-sato > for n450. > > Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil-7.0.1, which in > theory should match the tarball I ran with in the above test. I cloned > meta-intel and checked out the branch denzil, just as above. > > So this good news is that worked as expected. The denzil-7.0.1 tag > equals the tarball. > > So the only problem is the denzil branch of poky has some problem that's > seen in denzil-7.0.1 as it relates to n450. >
I'm not sure what you mean by this - I just did a build of poky/denzil with meta-intel/denzil and again, didn't see any problems with that permutation either. Tom > Jim A > > > >> Tom > >> > >> > >>> Tom > >>> > >>>> Jim A > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> yocto mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> yocto mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
