On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:37 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 <b29...@freescale.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:49 AM, David Nyström <david.nyst...@enea.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, it looks like this was merged to the denzil branch, and >>> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_linux-libc-headers-nativesdk was moved back to >>> distro.conf. >>> Any reason for this ? >> >> why do you want nativesdk headers to come from BSP its a fsl-ppc bsp I >> dont expect it to have something special for SDK hosts which are >> usually x86 ? afterall these are for >> the SDK host and not for target. Moreover it means that this BSP will >> not play in the multi BSP environment something you never want. > > But, I think we might need them for this warning specifically: > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies > NOTE: multiple providers are available for lib32-linux-libc-headers > (lib32-linux-libc-headers, lib32-linux-libc-headers-yocto, > lib32-linux-qoriq-sdk-headers) > NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match > lib32-linux-libc-headers > NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime > lib32-linux-libc-headers-dev (lib32-linux-libc-headers, > lib32-linux-libc-headers-yocto, lib32-linux-qoriq-sdk-headers) > NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match > lib32-linux-libc-headers-dev >
This is a bug in OE-Core, it should have added appropriate defines for multilib case as well in tcmode-default.inc and default-providers.inc > ? > > -M _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
