Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> writes:
> On 09/19/2012 01:53 PM, Marc Ferland wrote: >> Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> writes: >> >>> On 09/19/2012 01:41 PM, Marc Ferland wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm currently trying to create a "live" system with squashfs+unionfs and >>>> I stumbled on the same bug described here: >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2331 >>>> >>>> I was wondering if there was a plan to resolve this issue for 1.3? >>>> >>> Marc, >>> >>> It seems to be marked as resolved and verified, is there still and >>> issue? If so we need to reopen this bug. Or are you referring to the >>> underlying issue? >>> >> I was referring to the underlying issue. >> >> > No, unfortunately it seems that did not have visibility, I think bug > 1487 is open against that issue, at least with an ISO image, which is > what got partially reverted. I think the issue was upstream unionfs, > do you know if any changes to resolve the problem upstream? > Unfortunately no. Maybe I'll have more chance using aufs or maybe overlayfs. Unionfs looks pretty much dead... I'm probably better off without it! _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto