On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 01 October 2012 14:21:47 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Paul Eggleton >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Monday 24 September 2012 19:03:57 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> >> CentOS release 5.8 (Final) >> > >> > OK, so do we keep 5.6 / 5.7 or remove them in favour of 5.8? >> >> I don't think you can... each of these present different issues I've >> found and fixed along the way. > > OK, I'll leave them in for the moment. > >> >> Fedora release 13 (Goddard) >> > >> > I think this is probably too old for us to be declaring support for, since >> > it has been unsupported upstream for some time now. >> >> This has been working for me for a while (with a lot fewer issues to >> fix than CentOS 5.x) unless I'm missing something, I don't think it's >> too old. > > I consider it too old because of its upstream support status, but also because > broadly we commit to supporting N and N-1 (and usually N+1) where N is the > most recent release of the distribution. Fedora 13 would be N-4. > > Not having Fedora 13 (or any other distro or distro version, for that matter) > in this list does not mean that you can't continue to use it, nor does it > necessarily mean that we won't take patches to fix support for it should it > break.
Perhaps a better solution here is to have two lists. An officially tested and supported along with a known not to work list. -M _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
