Or in Yocto Project context, we kind of use ADT more inclusive that referring 
what Mark talked about SDK, the eclipse plug-in and other developers tools.  
And we don't call out SDK that much.

 --Jessica

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Mark Hatle
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 7:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [yocto] IMHO, cross-compile/toolchain examples should use non-x86 
arches

On 12/16/12 4:57 PM, Sean Liming wrote:
>
> My 2c (USD) is for clarity on ADT vs. SDK vs. Toolchain.

The biggest clarify problem I've seen is the terms being intermingled.  There 
are clear definitions for each.

Toolchain, the compiler and related tools that enable compiling software for a 
given target.

SDK - Software Development Kit - On OE-Core this purpose of this is to enable 
developing software to be run on a specific target environment, generally also 
constructed from OE-Core.  The SDK consists of three primary components:
   1) environment setup files - these configure the compilation environment 
with the right settings
   2) nativesdk software - these are applications that run on the -host- system 
to assist in compiling software for the target (this includes the target 
toolchain.)
   3) target sysroot - The sysroot is the collection of libraries, headers and 
assorted items that are compiled for the target.  A sysroot is setup in a 
similar fashion as a target's root filesystem.

ADT - Application Developer Tool - This is an Eclipse component that can use 
the SDK, generated by OE-Core, to enable application development within the 
Eclipse framework.  (I may be slightly wrong on this item, as people have told 
me in the past there are command line parts to the ADT.... but the ADT itself 
is -not- the
SDK.)

--Mark

> Regards,
>
> Sean Liming
> Owner
> Annabooks
> Tel: 714-970-7523 / Cell: 858-774-3176
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:yocto- 
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
>> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 8:55 AM
>> To: Yocto discussion list
>> Subject: [yocto] IMHO, cross-compile/toolchain examples should use 
>> non-
>> x86 arches
>>
>>
>>    a general preference on my part, but i think it would be useful if 
>> any
> yocto
>> docs that are discussing toolchains or cross-compilation or the like 
>> use
>> *non*-x86 architectures to get the point across.
>>
>>    for example, consider the current application developer's guide.
>> part of it uses, as an example, the toolchain installer
> poky-eglibc-x86_64-i586-
>> toolchain-gmae-1.4.sh.  while this works just fine, of course, what 
>> it
> does is
>> potentially co-mingle both the dev host content and target host 
>> content, making it harder than necessary for the reader to draw a 
>> clear distinction between the two.
>>
>>    if any example related to compilation or a toolchain involves, 
>> say, an
> *arm*
>> target, then it's *immediately* obvious (using the "file"
>> command) whether something belongs on the dev host or on the target.
>>
>>    also, if you're using x86 for both dev content and target content, 
>> you
> run
>> the risk of an example working by accident since you're picking up
> natively-
>> installed tools when you shouldn't be.  if you use a non-x86 arch, 
>> there's
> little
>> chance of that happening.
>>
>>    just my $0.02 (Cdn).
>>
>> rday
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ==========================================================
>> ==============
>> Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
>>                          http://crashcourse.ca
>>
>> Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
>> LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
>> ==========================================================
>> ==============
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>

_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to