On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Paul Eggleton < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 July 2013 08:56:34 Brian Hutchinson wrote: > > Thanks Paul, I worried about mixing branches since I've never tried that > > before. The only reason I picked Denzil is because I need ti816x support > > and Dylan and Danny don't have machine confs for it in meta-ti. So what > > would be easier, getting the machine support I need in Dylan or back > > porting the net-snmp recipe to Denzil? > > I don't have a feel for the former - if the reason is not already clear > you'd > probably want to ask the meta-ti folks why that machine isn't supported in > later branches and how hard it would be to update support. This might be > worth > doing if you're starting something new with denzil, since that's two > versions > behind current stable. > > Having said that, backporting the net-snmp recipe should be fairly trivial > though. > > Thanks. Yea, with Classic everything was just there (warts and all) and as I move more of our platforms to OE-Core I find that support for machines (some old, some new) or recipes that I used to use aren't there so I'm not too adept to figuring out how to wire everything back together to get what I need. I use the oe layer index search feature a lot! :) Regards, Brian
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
