On 26 July 2013 12:10, Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: > As far as I can tell, the reference documentation does not write that > anywhere what you are claiming here. So you are either incorrect, or I need > to file a bugreport to fix the documentation.
I'd say it's a fair assumption that when the documentation says "supported on FooLinux" we mean "supported on a typical and working installation of FooLinux". > No doubt a common "normal" could be found for Arch as well, which is what I > have been referring to, in several emails of this thread now. I do not see > Arch exclusive, respectively. All Arch needs to be in the supported list is a long-term stable release, and someone willing to do the testing. You're clearly interested in being the latter, so when the former exists please say. Via Google I see there's been at least two attempts but nothing has actually stuck around. Ross _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
