On 11/10/13 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Saul Wold <[email protected]> wrote:
Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is because
it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we know that
meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with
meta-qt5.
The biggest missing feature at meta-qt5 is the lacking of toolchain
support; I am still looking for someone to sponsor me to work on this
(as it is not a small task), a critical need from my side for it or
someone step on and do it :)
Yes, and ideally it would be nice if this toolchain would be easy to use
with QtCreator.
Some weeks ago, I had a look at writing a Yocto plugin for QtCreator
(using Danny/Qt4), and the biggest problem was how you "activate" the
toolchain, sourcing the env setup is good when you work in a shell, but
it would be better if the toolchain comes with a machine friendly
manifest file, this would allow as well to use several yocto toolchains
(eg, for different architectures/machines) from within QtCreator.
My 2 cents.
Chris
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
