On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Philipp Wagner <[email protected]>wrote:
> Am 11.12.2013 19:44, Gary Thomas wrote: > > On 2013-12-11 11:23, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Gary Thomas <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> On 2013-12-11 11:08, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:17 PM, <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:lists@philipp-wagner.__com > >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > >> > >> From: Philipp Wagner <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:mail@philipp-wagner.__com > >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Philipp Wagner <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:mail@philipp-wagner.__com > >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> > >> --- > >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb>> | > >> 6 ------ > >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb>> | > >> 6 ++++++ > >> > >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> delete mode 100644 > >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb>> > >> create mode 100644 > >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb>> > >> > >> diff --git > >> a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb>> > >> b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb>> > >> > >> deleted file mode 100644 > >> index 3631da5..0000000 > >> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.0.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb>> > >> > >> +++ /dev/null > >> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > >> -SRCREV = "__839f349b6ed2a63a2bff0b5f0d718a__7b07ca2316" > >> -SRC_URI = > >> "git:// > github.com/raspberrypi/__linux.git;protocol=git;branch=__rpi-3.12.y > >> <http://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git;protocol=git;branch=rpi-3.12.y > > > >> > >> < > http://github.com/__raspberrypi/linux.git;__protocol=git;branch=rpi-3.12.y > >> <http://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git;protocol=git;branch=rpi-3.12.y > >__> > >> \ > >> > >> - file://__sl030raspberrypii2ckernel.__patch \ > >> - " > >> - > >> -require linux-raspberrypi.inc > >> diff --git > >> a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb>> > >> b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb>> > >> > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..304c1ad > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb> > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.__12.3.bb > >> <http://linux-raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb>> > >> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > >> +SRCREV = "__7dac37b9865ab51f7a68b7703bf679__2b698fee1b" > >> > >> > >> > >> As pointed in https://review.gherzan.ro:__8443/#/c/27/ > >> <https://review.gherzan.ro:8443/#/c/27/>, it seems this SRCREV is > >> invalid. > >> > >> > >> Since that note has little detail, are you sure that this is not > >> just a case where the desired SRCREV is on a branch other than > >> 'master'? > >> With the latest bitbake master, you have to explicitly specify the > >> branch > >> if the desired revision is on a different branch. > >> > >> > >> I know. But the branch is already specified in SRC_URI. So most > >> probably upstream sqashed the repo? > > > > Indeed, I just checked the repo and it's not there. > > > > Looks like the correct rev might be > > 9fbb114990c409406ae20c56871727ff8d4fa6ca > > I may give this a go as it has V4L2 drivers for my camera which I'm > anxious > > to get going with Yocto :-) > > Oops, I totally forgot to reply. Yes, the revision existed but upstream > seems to be great at modifying a published repository (this has happened > before). [Maybe someone could give them an introduction how to handle > published git repositories ... argh] > > To go forward, just drop this patch and go with the one Gary posted today. No problem. I merged a couple of days ago the correct SHA and today updated the kernel to latest HEAD - merge will come soon. -- *ag*
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
