Vali, I'm excited to see CGL support for Yocto. I'm going to test this layer as soon as possible.
One question, which branch of Yocto is it based on? Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro sent from mobile. On Apr 9, 2014 11:05 AM, "Vali Cobelea" <[email protected]> wrote: > OK Paul, that indeed makes sense, I really did not knew that preliminary > versions of layers are accepted. > I will discuss around here and if everything goes OK we will start the > move in the "public" layer index. > I also do agree with an all-together strategy, no matter for the layer > state. > > > Much appreciated, > Vali > > > On 04/09/2014 02:01 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > >> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:55:47 Vali Cobelea wrote: >> >>> On 04/09/2014 01:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> >>>> On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:34:08 Vali Cobelea wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative regarding the CGL >>>>> compliance when it comes to the Yocto Project. >>>>> For this we started the work on a dedicated layer called 'meta-cgl' >>>>> >>>>> which can be accessed / cloned from here: >>>>> http://git.enea.com/git/?p=linux/meta-cgl.git >>>>> git clone [email protected]:linux/meta-cgl >>>>> >>>>> Have a look of the things we got there so far, please remember that >>>>> there is still plenty of work to be done (layer architecture, CGL >>>>> requirements coverage mode and so on). >>>>> It is a little bit more than a stub layer, consider it a starting point >>>>> for the direction we would like to have with this layer. >>>>> >>>>> Any input is much appreciated, lets keep the discussion by this email >>>>> thread and see where it goes. >>>>> >>>> I don't have anything to offer on the layer contents, but I would say in >>>> order to make it easy for people to find this layer I would strongly >>>> encourage you to> >>>> submit it to the OpenEmbedded layer index: >>>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/submit/ >>>> >>> Thank you for the input. >>> We will keep the layer for a short period of time at the current >>> location while getting other ideas regarding the content / architecture. >>> The layer initiative will also be raised up in the board advisory >>> meeting, in order to get even more input. >>> After which we will make it easier to find, access and use for anyone, >>> exactly as you suggested. >>> >> OK, as the maintainer it's totally up to you. >> >> I would say though generally that I'd like to see more people adding their >> work-in-progress layers to the layer index, even if at some time later >> they >> will be moved elsewhere or absorbed into another layer - it just makes it >> easier to point people to the layer index so they can find recipes that >> have >> already been written, rather than having to re-write them from scratch. >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> >> > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
