On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Alex J Lennon <[email protected]> wrote: ... > So I guess I'm at the point where I'm wondering if a getVar() with a > flag is behaving as you would expect it to, > or how I might go about ensuring either UBOOT_MACHINE or UBOOT_CONFIG > isn't defined? > > Thanks in advance for any advice,
I think we have a simple error error. You are mixing a recipe, which is old and a metadata layer with new concepts. The u-boot-imx, in 2009.08 recipe, used to set the UBOOT_MACHINE in the recipe as it was left as a fallback in case user needed it and the value was different from newer releases. In your case, the easier is to make a new yourmachine.conf and use the UBOOT_CONFIG or UBOOT_MACHINE setting there so it will work just fine. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
