Hi Darcy,
Thank you for your feedback.
I think this is a bug which needs to be fixed.
I've filed a bug in bugzilla with information in your emails.
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6376
Best Regards,
Chen Qi
On 05/27/2014 03:54 AM, Darcy Watkins wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 11:21 -0700, Darcy Watkins wrote:
Hello,
In one of my bitbake recipes, I have...
inherit update-rc.d
...
INITSCRIPT_NAME = "watchdog-progressd"
INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 09 S . stop 90 0 6 ."
I found what I think the cause is. The '09' must be parsed as a number
rather than a sort-key string of digits so it is handled as an illegal
octal literal.
'07' and less was fine. '08 and '09' failed. I am guessing that the
literal parser returned a zero value, hence the S00.
So I switched to NOT use leading zero and it was handled OK. It also
padded the '8' or '9' with a leading zero in the output.
INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 9 S . stop 90 0 6 ."
This is one to add to a "...for dummies" series. ;-)
...and then I install my initscript at
${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d/watchdog-progressd during do_install()
According to examples I have seen (and some of my other packages/recipes
that worked with no problem), this should result
in /etc/rcS.d/S09watchdog-progressd symlinking
to /etc/init.d/watchdog-progressd
What sort of error would cause it to show up in /etc/rcS.d/ as
S00watchdog-progressd instead?
That is 'S00' rather than 'S09'.
I am building for an x86 target using 'daisy' branch.
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
