After reading manual I assumed that /deltask/ will reorder the dependences.
If this is expected behaviour it is fine for me :)
I use /noexec/ flag then.
Regards,
Marcin
W dniu 21.05.2015 o 14:55, Paul Eggleton pisze:
Hi Marcin,
On Thursday 21 May 2015 12:47:05 Marcin Krzemiński wrote:
I am writing recipe that inherits from *native*.
I removed do_compile task using: *deltask do_compile*
When i was ruing bitbake my-recipe all works fine, but when I added recipe
to *EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS *and run* bitbake core-image-minimal *tasks were
reordered in some strange way that task do_install was performed before
do_fetch.
When I hanged *deltask do_compile *to *do_compile[noexec] = "1" * all went
back to normal.
I found *deltask *in manual so I do not know, is it a bug or not?
I suspect this is because all deltask does is delete the task, it does not
reconnect the dependency chain such that tasks that depended on the deleted
task would depend on the tasks that the deleted task depended upon, so what
you get in this case is do_install no longer having any dependencies. To be
honest the current behaviour seems reasonable to me, though it is not
immediately obvious and ought to be described in the manual. I think in your
situation you really do want to set the noexec flag rather than using deltask.
Cheers,
Paul
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
