On 2015-08-14 02:41 AM, wenzong fan wrote:
On 08/12/2015 09:05 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote:
[[yocto] [meta-selinux] How about remove libcap-ng from meta-selinux?]
On 15.08.12 (Wed 17:08) wenzong fan wrote:

Hi All,

There's a libcap-ng in meta-oe layer, it has been updated to 0.7.7
and the
one in meta-selinux is 0.7.3.

How about removing the one in meta-selinux and get this layer depends on
meta-oe? Any suggestions?

The last time we had this discussion my sense was that most users of
meta-selinux wanted to continue with it only depending on oe-core.
That's my preference as well.

I'm happy to merge an updated version of libcap-ng (or maybe I'll get to
it myself, since I've known about it since Armin removed it from
meta-security, that was the time of the last discussion, I think).

All I'm saying right now is that this isn't a case of accidental
duplication of recipes in multiple layers, it's the result of a
conscious decision.  It's totally worthwhile re-visiting that decision,
though to make sure the reasons are still valid.


Thanks for clarifying this, just send out an update patch for libcap-ng.

I still think it belongs in oe-core.

Wenzong,

Can you try to build up a case for that?
If I look at the dependencies on Ubuntu-15.04:

Reverse Depends:
  qemu-system-common,libcap-ng0
  libvirt0,libcap-ng0
  libvirt-bin,libcap-ng0
  libcap-ng0:i386,libcap-ng0 0.7.4-2
  libcap-ng0:i386,libcap-ng0 0.7.4-2
  suricata,libcap-ng0
  libcap-ng-utils,libcap-ng0 0.7.4-2
  ladvd,libcap-ng0
  heimdal-kdc,libcap-ng0
  audispd-plugins,libcap-ng0
  smartmontools,libcap-ng0
  qemu-system-common,libcap-ng0
  libvirt0,libcap-ng0
  libvirt-bin,libcap-ng0
  libcap-ng-dev,libcap-ng0 0.7.4-2
  irqbalance,libcap-ng0
  gnome-keyring,libcap-ng0
  dbus-1-dbg,libcap-ng0
  dbus,libcap-ng0

note that pkgs in:
  meta-virtualization: irqbalance, libvirt, more?
  meta-selinux: audit
  meta-security-framework: audit
could drop the local versions of libcap-ng and use the
oe-core libcap-ng.


Please check on the actual source/configure options so that
we(I!!) get a better understanding of where libcap vs libcap-ng
is used.

In fact, since meta-security-framework isn't using selinux, I'd
say that both audit and libcap-ng should both move to oe-core.


Thanks,
../Randy



Wenzong


--
# Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River
Direct: 613.963.1350 | 350 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K2K 2W5
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to