> On 15 Mar 2016, at 23:05, Christopher Larson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM Chris Tapp <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress? > > master-next is rebased. I wouldn't recommend using it unless you need to test > something specific which is on that branch and isn't yet on master, otherwise > I'd wait for changes to hit master. master is volatile enough at times ;)
Thanks. Just working through an “introspection” message as we speak ;-) Just seeing where I’m at so I can jump when 2.1 is released :-) -- Chris Tapp [email protected] www.keylevel.com ---- You can tell you're getting older when your car insurance gets real cheap!
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
