On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Andrei Gherzan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:47:40PM +0200, Herve Jourdain wrote: >> Hi Andrei, Khem, >> >> That's what I implemented in the upcoming v2 - except for the python >> checking function part. >> One thing, shall I call the variable CMA_SIZE, or VC4_CMA_SIZE? >> I know CMA is kind of common, but we're using this only to trigger a >> parameter to the v4c overlay. >> Any opinion? (in the current implementation, I went with CMA_SIZE, but I >> have doubts...) >> > > Hint: Try to reply in line if possible. It is easier to follow the > discussion in this way. > > I would vote for VC4_CMA_SIZE. It sounds safer.
yes > > -- > Andrei Gherzan -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
