On 12/12/16 09:41, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 08:59 -0600, Mariano Lopez wrote: >>>> In particular the "complexity" column is a bit subjective. Stefano, I >>>> hope you don't mind that I did not quite buy the "easy to use" >>>> characterization of swupdate ;-) >>> No worry...and I have not written myself. It was inserted by Mariano, so >>> it looks like that swupdate at least for Mariano is "easy to use". >>> I think it is correct to point out that customization is required. >> Compared to other update mechanism that I tested it was the easier to >> implement. > Which "getting started" document or presentation were you using? The > documentation for mender (https://docs.mender.io/) is very > straight-forward (partly of course because it doesn't need to cover many > variations), while for swupdate > (http://sbabic.github.io/swupdate/swupdate.html) I found it less clear > how to begin. >
When I did a research in update mechanism, mender wasn't yet available, and indeed it seems very straight forward (need to test it before final veredict). But if you compare SWUpdate, swupd, and OSTree; SWUpdate is by far less complex than the other two -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
