On 21-01-17 13:41, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
Hello Mike,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Mike Looijmans <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
An no one (except one of the systemd folks) has come up with a program
that just waits for the the processes to finish (with a timeout) and only
uses the "-9" double barrel shotgun to finish only the ones that didn't
respond?
(though doing that is rather pointless if the system power is about to be
cut anyway...)
What lesser-brain-dead "one of the systemd folks" solution is that?
Sorry if I wasn't clear. The systemd folk seems to have gotten it right.
The problem with the "sleep" is that 5 seconds is way too long, since most
processes will finish in mere milliseconds. But 5 seconds is also way too
short, because if a program needs to spin up a harddisk to write out its final
state, it'll need about 7 seconds to do so on the average 3.5" disk...
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
