Thanks Andre. Inclusion of -Wl,-soname,libmvudrv.so.1.0.1 in Makefile solved the problem
Regards, Shakthi On 27/04/18, 12:42 AM, "Andre McCurdy" <[email protected]> wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Shakthi Pradeep (tpradeep) <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the info Andre. What you are suggesting it to be done while building an application over these libraries right? No. The soname needs to be set when the library is linked. > Any idea why the packaging is failing? I don't think packaging is failing. > Regards, > Shakthi > > On 27/04/18, 12:00 AM, "Andre McCurdy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Shakthi Pradeep (tpradeep) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Folks, > > > > I am trying to integrate an SDK which is very simple and small. Building the > > SDK generates an executable and few .so libraries. > > > > “bitbake sdk” command goes through fine but when I run “bitbake > > wrlinux-image-glibc-std” to generate an ISO with SDK packages I am get > > following error > > > > ... > > > > install -m 0755 ${S}/lib/libmvudrv.so > > ${D}/${libdir}/libmvudrv.so.1.0.1 > > > > ln -sf libmvudrv.so.1.0.1 ${D}/${libdir}/libmvudrv.so > > Unfortunately, creating versioned libraries requires more than just > renaming and creating a symlink. > > If the library is going to be renamed during installation, then the > soname (which is set within the library when the library is linked) > needs to match a name which will exist in the target rootfs at > runtime. > > In this case, since "libmvudrv.so.1.0.1" is the name which will be > present at runtime, when the build creates libmvudrv.so, it needs to > set the soname to "libmvudrv.so.1.0.1". ie add the following to the > linker commandline: > > -Wl,-soname,libmvudrv.so.1.0.1 > > -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
