Greetings All, I am trying to get the below recipe to build: SUMMARY = "Recipe to build the 'nano' editor"
PN = "nano" PV = "2.2.6" LICENSE="GPLv3" SITE = "http://www.nano-editor.org/dist"; PV_MAJOR = "${@d.getVar('PV',d,1).split('.')[0]}" PV_MINOR = "${@d.getVar('PV',d,1).split('.')[1]}" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "${SITE}/v${PV_MAJOR}.${PV_MINOR}/COPYING;md5=f27defe1e96c2e1ecd4e0c9be8967949" SRC_URI = "${SITE}/v${PV_MAJOR}.${PV_MINOR}/${PN}-${PV}.tar.gz" SRC_URI[md5sum] = "03233ae480689a008eb98feb1b599807" SRC_URI[sha256sum] = \ "be68e133b5e81df41873d32c517b3e5950770c00fc5f4dd23810cd635abce67a" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "${SITE}/v${PV_MAJOR}.${PV_MINOR}/COPYING;md5=f27defe1e96c2e1ecd4e0c9be8967949 python do_fetch() { bb.plain("Downloading source tarball from ${SRC_URI} ...") src_uri = (d.getVar('SRC_URI', True) or "").split() if len(src_uri) == 0: bb.fatal("Empty URI") try: fetcher = bb.fetch2.Fetch(src_uri, d) fetcher.download() except bb.fetch2.BBFetchException: bb.fatal("Could not fetch source tarball.") bb.plain("Download successful.") } addtask fetch before do_build python do_unpack() { bb.plain("Unpacking source tarball ...") os.system("tar x -C ${WORKDIR} -f ${DL_DIR}/${P}.tar.gz") bb.plain("Unpacked source tarball.") } addtask unpack before do_build after do_fetch python do_configure() { bb.plain("Configuring source package ...") os.system("cd ${WORKDIR}/${P} && ./configure") bb.plain("Configured source package.") } addtask configure before do_build after do_unpack python do_compile() { bb.plain("Compiling package...") os.system("cd ${WORKDIR}/${P} && make") bb.plain("Compiled package.") } addtask compile before do_build after do_configure do_clean[nostamp] = "1" do_clean() { rm -rf ${WORKDIR}/${P} rm -f ${TMPDIR}/stamps/* } addtask clean And am working why this error is occuring: ERROR: ParseError at /tmp/bbhello/meta-hello/recipes-editor/nano/nano.bb:15: unparsed line: 'LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "${SITE}/v${PV_MAJOR}.${PV_MINOR}/COPYING;md5=f27defe1e96c2e1ecd4e0c9be8967949' I looked through the logs already and it was reported but only changed the file number seemed to change it. I am wondering if there is a better solution or why that's a bad CHSUM variable according to bitbake. Thanks, Nick -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
