> On 12/5/18 11:12 AM, madoga wrote: > > > Hello List, > > I am trying to configure my entire filesystem by using > > FILESYSTEM_PERMS_TABLES > > variable pointing to my custom fs-perms.txt, but it does not work. While I > > debugged package.bbclass looking for any error or failure, I found something > > strange with os.chmod & os.lchown methods (at function fix_perms): > > # Fix the permission, owner and group of path > > def fix_perms(path, mode, uid, gid, dir): > > if mode and not os.path.islink(path): > > #bb.note("Fixup Perms: chmod 0%o %s" % (mode, dir)) > > os.chmod(path, mode) > > # -1 is a special value that means don't change the uid/gid > > # if they are BOTH -1, don't bother to lchown > > if not (uid == -1 and gid == -1): > > #bb.note("Fixup Perms: lchown %d:%d %s" % (uid, gid, dir)) > > os.lchown(path, uid, gid) > > I have hardcoded mode variable to “0333”, just for testing: os.chmod(path, > > 0o333)and I have seen that permissions were been configured into a “0711”. > > Also > > I am going to ask about os.lchown, due to my filesystem is still been owned > > by > > my user and my group. > > Does anyone have an idea about what is going on? Has somebody have the same > > problem? > > The commands run under the pseudo environment. Pseudo captures these commands > and stores them in a database it can 'replay' at any time. > > It only make them in the actual filesystem if permitted by the host. > > You must look at the filesystem results in the live system (running pseudo) or > in the results of the build -- otherwise what you are looking at is not valid. > > (BTW this is the reason that the commended code was left in that function. In > case something is wrong, just remove the comments and you'll get notes on what > it is doing to help debug. This shouldn't be necessary unless you are > developing the function itself.. but that is why they are there.) >
Thank you for your reply Mark! Does the pseudo environment allow to set the entire rootfs by using fakeroot? Perhaps this is not the right way to make it, I am not pretty sure about that. I would like to obtain my rfs with a concrete permissions when bitbake finishes, folders, executables... Is there another/better way to accomplish? About debbuging bb.notes, I have already removed the comments and everything seems working OK. Best Regards, Mario > --Mark > > > Thank you > > Best Regards, > > Mario -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto