On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 12:05 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 05:20, Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de> wrote: > > > That's a good start. For a oe-core packagegroup > > > > I do not think a core-only packagegroup makes sense when the goal > > is to > > completely replace busybox (and not just most apps while keeping a > > few > > busybox apps installed). > > But a "close enough" packagegroup in core would be a good starting > point. > > > > I'd suggest dropping > > > dnsmasq bridgeutils bindutils to keep it lean. > > > > The stated usecases are not "lean" but "replace all busybox > > commands > > with the full versions". > > > > For that you need bind-utils (in oe-core) for DNS lookup. > > Good point well made. > > > Also swap vim for something in core obviously. > > > > It is not obvious how to do that. > > > > What other vi implementation is in core? > > Is there even any good non-busybox non-GUI editor in core? > > Replacing busybox vi with ed would be a bad fit for the > > stated usecases. > > > > There has to be some vi implementation installed, > > and the "desktop command" implementation is vim. > > I thought we had some other editor in core, but can't see one. Worse > case we still use busybox for its vi... :)
This could be an argument for pulling a small number of things into OE- Core too... Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto