Alan, > >Till then i suggest we take the simplest approach of downloading these > > jars (one-time) and running the script. > > Not an ideal solution. If ObjectWeb requires these puppies, why > doesn't it put those jars into its, ObjectWeb's, own repo for us to > d/l?
If there was ANY legal way that we could do that, we would. The problem is that there isn't. The license on several of the jars ONLY allows redistribution as part of a complete application download. Thus, we cannot put them in a repository that maven can grab individually. There is NOTHING we can do about that other than to complain to Sun in hopes that they change the license. The newer stuff from Sun (like the jaxb 2.0 jars) are under the CDDL license that is allowed. So those jars can be put on ibiblio. However, other jars like activation, saaj, the jsr 181 and 250 jars, etc... are not CDDL (yet) and cannot be put there. There are more details about this directly on the Maven web site: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html Anyway, the Celtix team is hounding Sun. The Maven team is hounding Sun. Others are hounding Sun. However, only Sun can change the license on those jars to one that would allows putting them on ibiblio. Until then, the script thing is the best option we can come up with. (Although if you have an internal repository in your company, you could deploy the sun jars to your internal repository so you don't need to run the scipt thing.) That all said, I may change the script so that instead of downloading jaxws-ea3 from sun, you could just download the latest celtix distribution from objectweb and use that. If wget or lynx is available, we could even make that part of the script. -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED]