Sounds good. Let's get it started. On 5/31/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lars Kühne wrote: > Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote: >> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>> With that said, I think that we are treading in that gray area >>> called personal preference and that no one can reasonably throw a >>> technical veto on any of the above solutions; though there is one >>> exception of _requiring_ 3rd party loggers, which I think we have a >>> consensus on that being a bad thing in light of our inclusion of >>> Harmony. I think that everyone has had their say and that we are >>> ready for a vote. If there are no objections by Wednesday, I'll >>> start such a vote. >> >> Please start the vote. I would gladly do it myself, but I'm not so >> sure about what is required for a vote. >> >> Best regards, >> Anders >> > > Same here, I'm not sure either. Should this be a multiple choice vote > or a vote that just presents the option which seems to have the most > support / least resistance (based on earlier emails) and checks that > there is no veto? Multiple choice and hopefully there will be no veto. It will be nice to see where peoples' sentiments lie after all the discussions that have taken place. In the future, you guys can fire off votes on your own. If something is wrong procedurally, someone will jump in and point it out. There's no really strong rules other than a technical veto. The idea is to make decision points visible and to garner some kind of consensus. Regards, Alan Regards, Alan
-- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
