2006/7/26, Anders Hessellund Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexey Petrenko wrote: > If not then I got few questions/suggestions... > 1. Which of the jars produced by Yoko build are more suitable for our > needs? I'm looking on yoko-core... In addition you would probably want the yoko-rmi module, which implements the stuff in javax.rmi and javax.rmi.CORBA .
I've just checked Harmony sources... We got 2 java.rmi implementations :) But there is no javax.rmi...
Thanks.
In addition you would probably want an IDL compiler. Work on this has not started yet.
Yep, I've seen corresponding Yoko issue.
> 3. Yoko has more packages in org.omg then specified in 1.5 spec. Is it > possible to produce a special jar for Harmony without those packages? > :) As I understand it, the 1.5 spec requires CORBA version 2.3.1 + a few additions from later releases. Yoko implements CORBA version 2.4 (i think). It is currently not possible to run Yoko using version 2.3 of the CORBA spec.
Understood.
Would it be OK (from a Harmony standpoint) to provide a higher level of CORBA support than the spec requires? Provided, of course, that it is fully backwards compatible?
We should discuss that on harmony-dev.
> 4. Are you planing to put some prebuilt jars to your site? M1 release > for example... We think that the best way for us will be to download a > prebuilt Yoko jar and put it into our deploy directory. A M1 milestone is on the way.
And will you put some prebuilt jar to your site? :)
Does Harmony have any requirements regarding the dependencies we add to yoko? For example, the yoko-rmi module currently requires apache BCEL.
I think there will be no problem with this. We already have some dependencies with the projects with compatible licences. SY, Alexey -- Alexey A. Petrenko Intel Middleware Products Division
