I am a bit confused... Again, are we talking about overriding just the javax.rmi.CORBA implementation of the JRE with our own implementation?
Then the users of Yoko, can either choose to use the java.endorsed.dirs option or the property javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass whichever makes sense... For clarity I would think of putting the implementation in a separate jar & not in yoko-spec-corba. - Balaji -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 3:19 AM To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Location of javax.rmi package So that's what I'm talking about... User adds CORBA implementation and receives new implementations of javax.rmi with it. Which overrides javax.rmi from the JRE. And this can mislead people... SY, Alxey 2006/8/16, Anders Hessellund Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Separate jar for javax.rmi? > > I thought about putting it into the yoko-spec-corba jar along with the > org.omg classes. > -- Alexey A. Petrenko Intel Middleware Products Division
