[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-33?page=comments#action_12442171 ] Daniel Kulp commented on YOKO-33: ---------------------------------
[[ Old comment, sent by email on Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:52:41 -0400 ]] Umm.... should a jira issue be marked closed if there are no unit tests? Without tests, how do you know the jira is really fixed/closed? At the very least, a new jira issue should be opened to track the fact that tests are completely missing. However, I would say the original jira issue remains open until test coverage is "satisfactory". (definition open to interpretation) Basically, add a comment saying "source patch applied, unit tests required" or similar. Dan -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > RMI/IIOP implementation > ----------------------- > > Key: YOKO-33 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-33 > Project: Yoko - CORBA Server > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Kresten Krab Thorup > Assigned To: Anders Hessellund Jensen > Attachments: trifork-rmiiiop.tgz > > > The attached tgz includes Triforks rmi/iiop implementation, which may be used > as a starting point for the Yoko projects's implementation hereof. The code > doesn't compile as it is ripped right out of the Trifork T4 application > server. (follow up email coming up) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
