2006/11/24, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> 2006/11/24, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
>> > 2006/11/24, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
>> >> > 2006/11/23, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> >> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
>> >> >> > Do we want to be Java5 compatible?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Yes, I understand that Yoko is CORBA 2.4 while Java5 and even
>> 6 are
>> >> >> > CORBA 2.3. This means that it is impossible to create fully
>> >> compatible
>> >> >> > version since it will require downgrading Yoko and this is not a
>> >> >> > choice.
>> >> >> Why is that true?
>> >> >> Does CORBA 2.4 not include a complete CORBA 2.3?
>> >> > Fully compatible means "both directions" for me.
>> >> I don't understand what that means.
>> > Both directions compatibility means that every program designed for
>> > Java5 can be executed on Yoko and every program designed for Yoko can
>> > be executed on Java5.
>> But Harmony can't commit to such support - we are implementing a
>> specific API (Java 5), and Yoko is free to do what it wants to...
> That's why I said that it is impossible to make Yoko fully compatible
> with Java5 in my first email. And nobody wants to. And nobody asks to.
sorry - I feel like we're going in circles here. I don't understand...
Why can't yoko implement CORBA 2.3 completely (if that is our
requirement for JDK 5)?
I've never said that. That's possible.
The TCK for SE 5 probably wont' care of there's *more* CORBA in there,
so the 2.4 things, if compatible with 2.3, should be fine.
Right.
SY, Alexey
