Also, I think the other components of yoko (binding & the tools) can be made stable if given some time.
How about sometime around March end? Is that a reasonable time frame? - Balaji -----Original Message----- From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 1:24 AM To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Request for creating the M2 release. This reflects my sentiments as well. Regards, Alan On Feb 10, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > I agree, it would be excellent to have comprehensive > documentation. For now, the software is complete and well tested, > which is a lot more than I personally expect from 1.0 software. > When we do get better documentation, we can quickly release a 1.1. > > -dain > > On Feb 10, 2007, at 1:29 AM, Lars Kühne wrote: > >> IMHO what's really missing for a 1.0 final release is the >> documentation. I started some of it in the old wiki (http:// >> wiki.apache.org/incubator-yoko/OrbConfiguration), but that needs >> to be migrated to cwiki or the distribution tar ball. >> >> Any chance that IONA would donate some of their docs? That would >> be so much easier than trying to figure out the exact meaning of >> each configuration option by reading the code. >> >> -Lars >> >> Dain Sundstrom wrote: >>> I think we should release 1.0 final. The ORB is totally working >>> now and it has been throughly tested by the J2EE 1.4 tck. >>> >>> -dain >>> >>> On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: >>> >>>> Geronimo has made great progress on the TCK using Yoko, and >>>> we're starting to put things together for 1.2 release. For the >>>> 1.2 Beta release Geronimo shipped with an interim snapshot >>>> version, but for the final 1.2 release, we'd like to use an >>>> actual release version. Can we get the process started to ship >>>> an M2 release? And more importantly, can we get it released in >>>> a more timely fashion than was done for the M1 release? >>>> >>>> Rick >>> >>> >> > >
