I think we are ready to release our 1.0 version. We need to check the jira's currently in 1.0 to see if we have to move them or fix it before releasing...
- Balaji -----Original Message----- From: Rick McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:45 AM To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: A release in the near future ? So, what's the status of getting a new release out? It's been 3 months since Matt made his initial request, and Geronimo would like to ship their 2.0 release the first week of August without any SNAPSHOT dependencies. Rick Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote: > Hi, > > We are still working on some parts of the tools (idltowsdl & wsdltoidl) > & the binding, so that we can release complete yoko & not parts of it in > our next release. Also, we are waiting for the release of cxf, since we > depend on them for the binding runtime. > > CXF-dev: Can you guys give us an estimate of when the cxf release would > happen? > > >From my perspective, we should be ready by the end of this month to > release... > > - Balaji > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:18 PM > To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: A release in the near future ? > > I wanted to check and see if you might be releasing a version of Yoko > in the near future. As you're probably aware, Geronimo is using Yoko > as its ORB and we're testing our server for compliance. We'd like to > get a release of G out for Java One if possible and it would be > really useful to have a released version of Yoko. The only other > option I can see is to take a copy of Yoko and build our own copy of > it; which is think is sub-optimal for both projects and I'd really > prefer to not do that. If there are others please let me know :) > > I don't think we're ready for a release today but when we get to a > point where it looks like we've passed the appropriate areas that > include the ORB would y'all be willing to cut a release or a new > Milestone? > > Just looking for some community feedback so we can plan accordingly > in Geronimo. > > Thanks > > Matt > >