On Sep 6, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 6, 2007, at 4:05 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Other thoughts?
I think that Yoko would be better suited in Geronimo where we
are more server oriented. I think that given the plugable
nature of the ORB, the CXF bindings could probably move to CXF.
Actually, another idea might be OpenEJB. I think that there
could be lots of container server overlap here.
I don't think OpenEJB would be a very good fit any more. In the
Geronimo 2.0 release, the CORBA EJB binding support was moved from
OpenEJB into Geronimo, so OpenEJB doesn't contain any CORBA code.
Geronimo, I believe, is the only option if you wish to move it
closer to the servers.
While the interop code may reside in Geronimo, I still think that
there could be container synergies between Yoko and OpenEJB.
Could you elaborate a little bit? Why wouldn't this apply to Yoko
and Geronimo?
I would lean slightly towards including Yoko in Geronimo but I think
that's mostly because I think I'd work on it more there because it
would be in front of me more often rather than necessarily any better
fit. With the projects laid out as they are now it would certainly
be inconvenient to have yoko in openejb and then used in geronimo,
but we can fix that if there's a good reason.
thanks
david jencks
Regards,
Alan
