One thing I hear recommended over and over again by the opensource
old timers, it to keep the number of mailing lists down. They
suggest that you keep as much traffic on a list until people start to
complain and then split. The split becomes a positive event, and if
you never split then you end up with more people reviewing
suggestions (and hopefully more people involved in the code). In the
case of this project, I think merging into a bigger list would be a
positive development.
I don't have strong feelings on this... just wanted to relay what has
been pounded into my thick skull over the years :)
-dain
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Nolan, Edell wrote:
Hi,
It seems like CXF is going to accept the bindings and tools so I guess
questions for it will end up on the CXF dev list. It might be
useful to
keep the Yoko name to associate it with the orb if the orb is going to
be a sub-project in Geronimo. Maybe we can keep the list for it.
Thoughts ?
Edell.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2007 15:59
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Yoko dev list after split
I was thinking. Do you think that it makes sense to keep this list,
maybe under [EMAIL PROTECTED], since this core is shared
by a few projects?
Regards,
Alan
----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
Ireland
