Dari milis tetangga....
Wass,

>Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 09:53:49 -0500
>From: "Istadi, Bambang P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Iatmi_houston] FW: [Oil&Gas] FW: Listrik mahal - Inilah rahasianya
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Dari milis Migas Indonesia,...
>
>
>Bambang Istadi
>ConocoPhillips Inc.
>New Ventures Exploration
>+1-281-293-3763
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Desmawati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:16 AM
>Subject: [Oil&Gas] FW: Listrik mahal - Inilah rahasianya
>
>Inilah yang terjadi, yang menyebabkan PLN selalu rugi dan harga listrik
>harus naik tiap 3 bulan sekali.
>Dari milis tetangga.
>
>Regards,
>
>Desma
>
>____________________________________________________________________________
>
>Larouche Society   March 28/2001
>Looting Indonesia: The energy brokers 'warm-up' for California    by Michael
>Billington
>
>It is now widely acknowledged among sane individuals that the ongoing
>looting of California (and other states) by a handful of energy brokers,
>under the cover of 'deregulation', is having the effect, as if by design, of
>collapsing an economy which was already weakened by the bursting of the
>financial bubble. It is instructive to those who may doubt that such
>corporate geniuses would consciously destroy an economy, for nothing more
>than an apparent short-term gain, to examine the process of looting which
>has taken place against Indonesia since the mid-1990s, by many of the same
>entities now 'doing' California.
>Although the specific mechanism used was different, the species
>characteristic of the looting process was precisely the same. After the
>near-breakdown of the world financial system in 1987 and 1989, a
>hyperinflationary process was unleashed out of New York and London, based on
>the creation of a huge derivatives-based financial bubble, in order to
>preserve the power of the (actually bankrupt) global financial institutions.
>One aspect of this bubble was the 'globalization' process, generating hot
>money flows into developing nations, financing maquiladora-style cheap-labor
>export industries, and creating local bubbles in the real estate and equity
>markets in much of the Third World--and in Asia in particular.
>Energy generation, like most infrastructure in the Third World, was woefully
>inadequate in Asia, so the energy companies jumped in to meet the need--an
>admirable task, under normal circumstances, but conditions were hardly
>normal. Although the following profile of the Indonesia situation was
>repeated in nearly every country in the region, the Indonesian case is
>exemplary.
>
>Sweetheart Deals with Suharto
>Altogether, 27 joint venture energy contracts were set up in the early to
>mid 1990s in Indonesia. Each one included a foreign power producer--we'll
>examine below projects with MidAmerican, Edison Mission, and Florida Power
>and Light--in partnership with the Indonesian state electricity company,
>Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN), and an Indonesian private firm, inevitably
>run by one of President Suharto's children. All had the same general
>character: A power plant would be built on the condition that PLN (i.e., the
>government) would be bound to purchase a fixed amount of electricity each
>year, regardless of whether or not the electricity was needed at the time,
>and that the cost of the electricity would be determined in dollars, not in
>the local currency, the rupiah.
>These lucrative deals were set up through personal connections between the
>energy producers (and their international banks) and the Suharto family and
>friends, the same circle which was later denounced as 'corrupt' by the
>so-called 'international community'. While the fantasy persisted that the
>financial bubble would expand forever (a fantasy that persisted within the
>United States up until the past year), the Indonesian energy deals proved to
>be a bonanza for everyone involved.
>However, when the bubble burst in 1997-98, brought on by the speculative
>attack on the Asian currencies by the hedge funds, and the conditionalities
>imposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the energy deals were
>exposed for what they were--a scam which left the government helpless before
>the combined power of the multinational corporations, the international
>banks, the IMF, the United Nations, and the U.S. State Department, all of
>whom demanded that the corrupt contracts be honored in full, or Indonesia
>would be subjected to credit termination, economic sanctions, seizure of
>assets, and political destabilization by non-governmental organizations
>(NGOs) and other 'private' operations controlled by the Wall Street and
>London power elite.
>With the sudden collapse of the economy, and the subsequent rapid decline in
>energy needs, many of the newly built power plants were no longer needed.
>The risk, however, had been entirely transferred to the Indonesian
>government, through the corrupt conditions of the contracts. Indonesia was
>required to pay for electricity for which it had no use. Beyond that, since
>the electricity was priced in dollars, when the speculative raid drove the
>value of the Indonesian rupiah to about one-forth its former value, the
>government-owned PLN was forced to pay four times the actual value (in
>Indonesian terms) for the electricity it didn't need!
>The currency eventually settled at about one-third its former value. PLN
>raised the price on the electricity it sold to Indonesian consumers
>substantially, but it could not even begin to charge the price it was forced
>to pay the foreign producers. In fact, when President Suharto allowed an
>increase in the costs of certain fuels, it precipitated riots which
>ultimately brought down his government, and similar instability would have
>been certain in the case of any further drastic rate increases. The result,
>then, was that PLN was faced with purchasing huge quantities of energy at
>prices in the range of 5-8ct per kilowatt hour, while reselling only a
>fraction of that amount, and at only about 2-3ct per kilowatt-hour (kWh).
>This ridiculous, untenable situation could only be truly appreciated by a
>California governor!
>The Indonesian government approached the 27 different foreign producers with
>a request that the contracts be renegotiated to account for the drastically
>changed circumstances. In some of the cases where plants were not yet
>completed (or not yet begun), the contracts were cancelled, with requests
>for reasonable breach of contract settlements. The response was a barrage of
>hypocritical demands that the sanctity of contracts must be upheld. The
>extent to which pure thug tactics were used is demonstrated in the case
>studies below.
>Several leaders in the new Indonesian government pointed out the obvious
>inconsistency: Why is it that the IMF and other foreign interests insist
>that the 'cronyism and corruption' of the Suharto era must be ended, by
>imposing 'transparency', and by bringing those guilty of corruption to
>trial, but that the foreign partners who participated in the corruption (or,
>more likely, instigated it) are not only let off the hook of criminal
>responsibility, but their corrupt contracts must be respected to the letter?
>In August 1999, then-PLN president Adhi Satriya said he would ask the courts
>to 'annul contracts secured by the Independent Power Brokers through corrupt
>practices, and to punish all those involved'. He accused former PLN
>directors of signing contracts with 'marked-up prices', even before the
>devaluations. One former PLN chief, Djiteng Marsudi, said that he had been
>'forced' to sign such contracts under political pressure. In fact, as shown
>below, failure by the Indonesian government to meet the terms of these
>corrupt contracts led to legal proceedings in international courts which
>simply disregarded the question of the general welfare of the Indonesian
>people, and ignored rulings by Indonesian courts, while U.S. Ambassador
>Robert Gelbard and the IMF issued explicit threats of sanctions if the pound
>of flesh were not delivered As a result, the government is now losing
>billions of dollars every year to the power brokers, while the country
>descends further into poverty, social divisiveness, and rising levels of
>violence. Is that California's future under the current deregulation
>'free-market' policy?
>
>Case study #1: MidAmerican Energy Holdings
>MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company (formerly CalEnergy), owned by Warren
>Buffett, is both a leading international energy producer and a major player
>in the deregulated energy markets in the United States and the United
>Kingdom. MidAmerican contracted to build two geothermal power plants in
>Java. One plant was completed and one was under construction at the time of
>the 1997-98 collapse in Southeast Asia.
>When Indonesia put a hold on the incomplete plant, and could not meet the
>contracted purchases on the other, MidAmerican refused to renegotiate, but
>took the matter to the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
>(Uncitral). This international body ruled in favor of MidAmerican, ordering
>that Indonesia immediately pay $572 million to MidAmerican for breach of
>contract.
>PLN responded in May 1999, by filing suit in a Jakarta District Court to
>annul the Uncitral ruling as having 'gravely prejudiced PLN's legal rights
>by ignoring or misinterpreting the Indonesian laws', according to PLN
>President Adhi Satriya. The contracts, he said, were 'clearly specified to
>be subject to the sovereign laws of Indonesia'. MidAmerican returned to the
>Uncitral, which simply asserted its jurisdiction over the dispute
>'notwithstanding Indonesian court orders purporting to enjoin the
>arbitration ... in violation of generally recognized principles of
>international law'.
>Since Indonesia had no means of paying the extortionists, MidAmerican turned
>to its insurers, which included the U.S. government's insurance operation,
>the Overseas Private Investment Corp. (OPIC), which paid the American firm
>for its loss in the collapsed Indonesian market. Rather than leaving it at
>that, the U.S. State Department, behind the thugish U.S. Ambassador to
>Indonesia, Gelbard, went to work to collect the blood money. In July 2000,
>Gelbard announced that he was 'running out of patience' with Indonesia's
>tardy repayment to OPIC of the $290 million it had paid to MidAmerican.
>'There is always the possibility of declaring expropriation [of Indonesian
>assets].... If we were to do this', snarled the diplomat, 'it would result
>in a dramatic deterioration of the rupiah and would hurt Indonesia very
>much'.
>
>Case study #2: Edison Mission Energy
>Edison Mission Energy (EME), the international arm of the same holding
>company, Edison International, which owns Southern California Edison,
>launched a $2.5 billion project in Indonesia in February 1994, called Paiton
>Energy, in partnership with General Electric, Mitsui, and a local firm run
>by an associate of General Suharto. The total energy production was
>contracted to the state electricity company, PLN, with all costs indexed to
>the Indonesian rupiah/U.S. dollar exchange rate established at the time the
>agreement was executed. The 30-year agreement called for PLN to pay 8.4ct
>per kWh for six years, declining slightly after that.
>As with MidAmerican, the entire risk was transferred to the Indonesian
>government. After the collapse in 1998, PLN president Adhi called on Paiton
>to lower their prices, calling the original price a 'world-class mark-up'.
>Adhi pointed out that the 'take-or-pay' clause, which held PLN to pay $995
>million per year for 'fixed costs', was enough to develop a new power plant
>of 600 megawatts each year. After a year of fruitless discussions, PLN went
>into court in Jakarta to nullify the contract as 'unlawful, unfair, and not
>transparent', and called on the court to declare the contract 'void and not
>enforceable'.
>Paiton then followed the path of MidAmerican's successful use of
>'extraterritoriality', going outside the Indonesian court system, to
>international arbitration, 'to preserve the sanctity of its power-purchase
>agreement and to protect the interest of its shareholders, lenders, and
>other credit support providers'. Let the welfare of the Indonesian people be
>damned. The Central Jakarta District Court appeared to be moving toward a
>favorable ruling for PLN, when the new government of President Abdurrahman
>Wahid, under intense pressure from the 'international community', decided to
>drop the suit, agreeing to an out-of-court settlement. PLN President Adhi
>and a top assistant resigned.
>
>Case study #3: Florida Power and Light
>In 1994, Florida Power and Light (FPL), in partnership with Caithness Energy
>(which has recently attached a lien on Southern California Edison for unpaid
>bills from the debt-ridden utility), contracted with PLN and Indonesia's
>state oil firm, Pertimina, to build a 400 mw geothermal plant in West Java.
>As in all the sweetheart deals with the Suharto regime, all risk was shifted
>to the government, including a clause which specified that Indonesia would
>bear the entire burden if the government took any action detrimental to the
>project.
>Between 1994 and 1998, FPL and its other foreign partners spent $93 million
>on site search, testing, and other preparatory measures, but had not begun
>construction when the crisis hit, causing the government to cancel the
>project, in January 1998. FPL took the case to the UN arbitration board,
>which not only awarded FPL its entire invested capital (since, of course,
>these 'free trade' deals bore zero risk), but awarded them an additional
>penalty of $150 million, for 'lost profits'--i.e., profits they could have
>extracted had the project gone through!
>In February of this year, FPL took the case to the U.S. District Court in
>the Southern District of Texas, with a petition to confirm the award and
>enforce payment. Why Texas? Because Pertimina has property and assets in
>Texas--the same assets Ambassador Gelbard had threatened to seize for
>MidAmerican--which FPL plans to grab for itself if the Indonesians refuse to
>wring the unearned profits out of the bare sustenance of the population.
>Other Cases: Enron
>There are other cases. Enron, the powerbroker now at the center of the
>criminal looting process in the United States, signed an agreement in 1996
>to build a power plant in East Java, which was to begin construction in late
>1997. When the contract was cancelled after the crisis, Enron walked away
>with $15 million. And there are more. Indonesia, with half its population
>suddenly thrust into poverty, with ethnic and regional conflicts tearing at
>the very structure of the republic, has been forced to bear the entire
>burden of the foreign 'shareholders' value'.
>For the year 2000, PLN posted losses of $2.2 billion, adding drastically to
>the nation's overall intolerable debt burden--and there is no indication
>that the looting process will end in the foreseeable future. Wherever the
>sovereign regulation of utilities are manipulated, eliminated, or ignored,
>the powerbrokers have proven to follow the lure of fast money, rather than
>the long-term need for the development of a nation's infrastructure. That
>this process destroys the future market for such power industries
>themselves, seems to be of no concern. America has watched passively as our
>friends and neighbors have been financially and economically raped, often in
>our name. Will we remain passive, now that the rapists have turned their
>sights on California?
>
>
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


--[YONSATU - ITB]----------------------------------------------------------
Online archive : <http://yonsatu.mahawarman.net>
Moderators     : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe    : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vacation       : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Kirim email ke