On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:33 -0500, James Bowes wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > Okay, I'm losing my mind on this so I'm going to write pseudo-code of > > what should be happening for this dep presentation. Everyone who can > > understand this, please respond: > > I can understand it! > > Seriously, it all seems sane. Though it did get me thinking: We > install/remove etc "physical" packages, but during depsolving, we're > concerned with just the provides/requires, etc. I wonder if there is > anything to be gained by mostly ignoring the actual packages during > depsolving, and only looking at the prco. This way, you might remove a > package, but if a given provides comes from something else, you won't > have to care about it. I'll see if I can actually make any sense of > this, but I'll do it much later :) > > -James > > PS you're going to write any missing bits using Test-Driven Development, > right? >
I wish I understood what that means. I've found that my ability to understand programming jargon is next to non existent. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
