Jeremy Katz wrote: >> Anyone think its broken? > > Yes :-) > > This makes it so that we don't ensure that the package in the > rpmdb/tsinfo actually matches the requirements of the package being > checked. The fact that the requirement names match isn't enough
My understanding is that the r, f, v tuple passed into requireByPkg is the requirement that we are concerned about, so if we get a result from rpmdb.whatProvides(r, f, v) then that's good enough. But if I was certain about it, I wouldn't have mailed the list ;) -James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
