On Wed, 16 May 2007 23:24:21 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > We _could_ make it so that ayum can be None and that doSetup can take an > ayum arg -- then, it wouldn't have to break API as old API users would > be guaranteed to be calling YumBase.doRepoSetup() which can do the right > thing; new callers would pass in the YumBase object to the constructor > and then it would be fine accessing later. But aiyee.
aiyee is right. I like how it is better than messing with a bunch of 'if none:'s. We can always change it if something better comes up, right? -James _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
