On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 11:28 +0200, Florian Festi wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > Florian, > > I looked through the diffs and there is just too much there to accept > > as one patch. > > Ehm, sorry. I thought I made that clear enough: This patch was never ever > intended to be accepted anywhere. This is a "tech preview", a first attempt, > a basis of discussion. >
Okay, Then this is what I misunderstood. I read through the depsolve branch patches, got pissed off and stopped reading the ffesti branch. Mea Culpa. I've gone through all the ffesti branches and have a few comments, otherwise I'm not grumpy anymore: 1. I'm not sure how the tsinfo lookups you've implemented (old and new provides) will play with localinstall pkgs where the rpmdb and the packageSack 2. about the search mechanism you implemented in sqlitesack _search. I think we'll need to be careful to unset the matched items in much the same way we need to be careful about figuring out how to completely reset yum and all of its objects when doing multiple runs w/i a single python instance. all in all, we can get the ffesti branch committed for something like 3.2.3. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@linux.duke.edu https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
