On Thursday 08 October 2009, Seth Vidal wrote: > On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > On Thursday 08 October 2009, James Antill wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:11 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >>> On Friday 02 October 2009, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> As someone mentioned Python 3 here and on fedora-devel... here's a > >>>> small patch that gets metadata entries' has_key() out of the way of > >>>> further has_key() related changes. > >>>> > >>>> So when previously one would do "entry.has_key(foo)", after this one > >>>> should do "foo in entry" instead. > >>> > >>> Any comments? > >> > >> We know we have to do this eventually, as the giant py3k suckage moves > >> towards us. I'm not sure we want to do it before 3.2.25 is released > >> though ... and we should really do a lot of it at once (see: git grep > >> has_key). > > > > Yes, that's pretty much the whole point of this patch: it gets the only > > instance of has_key() that can't be trivially changed to "in" or > > something else out of the way so the rest can be safely grepped and done > > at once. I have patches taking care of that as well, and I plan to start > > submitting them once this is in. > > you need to read your other direct email about the above...
Sorry, I don't follow, could you elaborate/rephrase? _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
