On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:54 -0400, James Antill wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:36 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > grumble. > > > > How about we just call the repo 'bad' if it lacks a base_persistdir and > > drop it on the floor. > > > > make the random code fix it? > > I'm not 100% against that, but given that it's only used for cakeys > atm. ... and almost nothing is using those, yet ... it seemed nicer to > just ignore it. And if we do that we'll need to add conflicts with other > packages. > Also I'm pretty sure that repoclosure, repodiff and verifytree all need > to be fixed. Although that might argue more for "die quickly and > loudly".
exactly- and I thought I made sure add_enable_repo was doing the right thing. worth checking, though. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
