> The general idea being that there is no reason to be "clever" for no > reason, esp. as we have to do that too often anyway.
#2 and #3 are easier to read than #1 because you don't have to match two 'foo' references that are 3 lines apart. #2 is almost always better than #3 because it's shorter (implicit lambdas), and more flexible (free 'map'). #3 is fine for 'filter(func, list)', as it eliminates redundant 'item for item in'. #1 might sometimes be preferable when you need statements to evaluate 'x' or 'y', but don't want to wrap it in a function. -- Zdenek _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
