> > > I meant that traditionally to have packages "move arch" we had > > > them obsolete older versions of themselves in their specfiles. > > > > Oh, now I see. That shouldn't hurt, but is it necessary? > > I guess it's rather a "make this special case explicit" and not the > default.
Ok, I get it. We have required foo-1.2 to explicitly obsolete foo-1.1 if their arches differ. But maybe arch <=> noarch updates are somewhat weaker case of "moving arches"? Anyway, I've added 'Obsoletes' to the test case: dummy-bz709225-2.spec +Obsoletes: dummy-bz709225 == 1.0-1 dummy-bz709225-3.spec +Obsoletes: dummy-bz709225 == 1.0-2 ..and the package gets updated with no changes in yum code. :: [ LOG ] :: Assertions: 6 good, 0 bad So should we just close this BZ now? -- Zdenek _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
