Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: > Discussions there centered mainly around naming; the name of 'environment' > was considered better than 'install class'. Updated patch attached. > > > > > From the UI POV though I think we need to integrate it into the current > > > > groups. So you could just do: yum install @blah ... to get an > > > > "installclass" group. I assume there are no plans to have installclasses > > > > with the same name as a normal group (so we can treat that as a WTF)? > > > > > > Hadn't ruled that out one way or another - the other option would be to > > > pick > > > a new magic starting character other than '@'. > > > > I saw that suggestion in the anaconda thread, and I'm pretty sure it's > > a terrible idea to have another magic character. > > anaconda seems greatly in favor of (from a kickstart perspective) of > treating it as a new item separate from groups, with a different delimiting > character. > > > > > Also are you sure you want to keep the feature that is display_order? > > > > > > Can maybe drop it and just say for anaconda UI purposes it follows file > > > ordering. > > > > Well I was assuming just using lexicographic order instead. Is there a > > need to change the order (to always have minimal at the top or > > something)? If so I guess just keep display_order, but given how we > > never use it for groups and that users don't expect it I thought it > > might be a good idea to not carry it forwards. > > I would like to have ordering of some sort; if file ordering can't be > preserved, then keeping display_order is best. > > Comments, concerns, other?
<poke> This is holding up the landing of a F-18 feature, so if there are issues with it, I would like to know. Bill _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
