On 06/25/2014 11:06 PM, James Antill wrote:
Of course, I understand that the yum community is not the target
audience of such a change. The packages in question which require
urlgrabber are e. g. anaconda, pykickstart or virt-manager.
My intention is that *I* would perform the change
Sure, sounds fine.
Great, I will start doing it right away then.
This is the reason why I asked which versions
are intended to be still supported should the change happen, because
having the code run on e. g. both Python 2.4 and 3.4 is a bit tricky, to
say the least.
It's probably easier to work and just have a py3 version, leaving the
py2 version at whatever is there now.
We'd rather keep one codebase, as it saves much work when fixing bugs or
doing other changes.
But if you want to merge both
languages for some reason, then it only needs to work on the latest
Fedora py2.x ... as there's no reason to ever backport it.
Awesome.
> It'd probably be best if the main package that is going to be using
> urlgrabber in F22+ owned it.
If by 'owning' you mean bundling, that's rather not possible, because a
multitude of packages depend on it, as stated above.
No, literally just whoever wants to be responsible getting
co-maintainer status in Fedora and maybe upstream.
We'll gladly take the co-maintainer status in Fedora, no problem.
Tomas
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
